I have listened to the feedback of both peers and teachers and have changed the most significant concerns. The most frequent criticism is that it didn't look aged enough for a jazz magazine. I understood now that the black and white photo and yellow background, wasn't enough for non jazz magazine readers to understand that it's based upon previous jazz magazines.Therefore, i created my own brush in Photoshop which creates speckle like additions to the image. This created an old fashioned essence, which from my analysis's was natural on more traditional jazz magazines due to less advanced printing. Additionally, i used a grain effect on the image itself, to recreate the less modern camera finish- which from my main inspirations was based in the 60's/70's where cameras were developing but not as developed as the 21st century.
I also changed my fonts. This is mainly because i felt the fonts didn't follow the codes and conventions as much as they should've. I also used these fonts such as 'bebas neau' because they have alternate versions such as ' neau ' which change it slightly to appear bolder. Using bolder fonts meant i can focus it on the texts which were more important, the ones i want the reader to instantly be intrigued by- such as the masthead 'floetry' or the insiders. Ultimately, i feel these fonts seem more on the traditional side to the jazz magazines i analysed, however even the modern magazines used minimalist fonts. Which in turn, makes the fonts i have used follow the codes and conventions of the initial appearance being traditional however the production behind it being modern.






